Monday, April 21, 2014

BRASS STARS Postcard Giveaway WINNERS!

There were four entrants with a total of 7 entries. Since I didn't want anyone to think I was biased in who was selected as the two winners, I enlisted the help of Ginger Hulk.

The two names he stuck his nose in are the winners. Congratulations to Katheryn McKade and @Pyorin12!

Mary Rajotte and Skyline Spirit are runners up and will receive bookstubs.

Please contact me at annagrace(dot)carpenter(at)gmail(dot)com so I can get a mailing address from you.

Thanks for playing and stay tuned for more giveaways coming soon.

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Giveaway! (Take 2!)

Want to have a copy of the amazingly fantastic cover art for BRASS STARS in hard copy? Well, you're in luck.

Starting Thursday April 17th at 8 PM (EST) through Sunday April 20th at 8 PM (EST), I'm giving away postcards featuring the brilliant cover from BRASS STARS (created by the totally amazing Lex Paul).

To enter your name in the drawing just leave a comment below OR send a tweet my way @aggy_c with the hashtag #BrassStarsPostcardGiveaway. (Or both, but only one entry per method per person, please.)

Want an extra entry? Then tweet a link to this blog post and mention the giveaway.

I will draw at least two names from a hat on Monday (April 21st) and contact the winners to arrange receipt of their postcard. (Custom autographed in my terrible unique handwriting.) The more entries I receive, the more postcards I will give away.

Good luck!

P.S. This is the first of several giveaways I am arranging over the next couple of months. If you don't get a postcard this time around be sure to check back because I'll be giving away more postcards, bookstubs and a couple other goodies.

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

The Internet Sees All (Writing Update 4.8.14)

Sometimes (when I remember) I play Rejectomancy over at the Absolute Write forums. This consists of posting the name of the market from which I received my latest rejection and how many days it took to get a response. On occasion I post an additional observation on something the editor said.

Now first of all, let me talk about rejections. There is a school of thought that says you never talk about anything but acceptances in public. There are a couple of reasons for this. 1. You avoid looking like your work isn't selling. (Even if it isn't.) 2. You avoid the appearance (and temptation) of a "sour grapes" attitude toward editors that have rejected your work.

I totally get that. But I also think it's helpful as a community to pool one's knowledge about a market as much as possible. And part of that pool of knowledge contains details on how long it takes to get a response, if they send out mostly forms, etc.

Today I posted the following over in the W1S1 Rejectomancy thread.

22 day personal from STRAEON. Mr. Blake indicates he is never going to be the right editor to send zombie stories to, no matter how well written.

Aggy, challenge accepted! (Kidding. Sort of.) 

Only a few minutes later I received an email from Mr. Blake gently cautioning me from encouraging folks from sending him zombie stories because it would be a waste of time (both theirs and his).

Now I must make two things very clear.
1. I am extremely stubborn. When anyone tells me that something is overdone/boring/too much of a fad to be saleable, I immediately add that to my list of things to write. (I have a short vampire unromance on submission right now that was - in part - a response to all the Twilight hatred and the erroneous conclusion drawn that vampire fiction (especially contemporary vampire fiction) was a has-been.) So, when an editor tells me that they don't like X, I determine to work harder to redefine whatever X may be.
2. If an editor tells me not to send them a particular type of thing, I know better than to waste my time doing that. (I'm not talking about "This will be a hard sell for us." stuff. Almost every market has a list of X, Y, and Z that they feel are going to be difficult to win them over. Almost every market also has certain things that are an absolute no. They are not the same thing and submitting stories that fall into the latter category will only make you look like an idiot.)

So, while I am feeling personally challenged to write more, better zombie fiction, I also know not to send it to STRAEON. (And you should too.)

But I have an even bigger point to make here and it is simple: The internet sees all.

This is one reason folks sometimes avoid rejectomancy, because someone from the market you mention might see what you say and be offended. Some folks do rejectomancy but they use numbers or symbols to hide the market's name from search engines. (STR4EON or As!imovs, for instance.) Which is all well and good. If that makes you feel more comfortable, then maybe you should do that.

But it's a better policy to not say things online that will offend potential business partners. Whether you're Tweeting or blogging or posting in forums you should consider that if you want to keep a market from seeing what you're saying, then perhaps you shouldn't be saying it. (I have a secondary rule which runs along the lines of: "If I'm making a reasonable observation about a market and they are offended by it, they are probably not someone I want to work with." Thus far it has not steered me wrong.)

So, there's my helpful advice for the week.

In writing news, I have been chugging away on the Spider-thief novella. It's chugging along steadily. I had thought it would be done by now, quite frankly, but with RL stress and struggles and a series of burgeoning subplots, I'm not done yet. (It's really good though, so I'm pleased. Just not finished yet.)

When I was working on The Steampunk Novel back around Christmas, I had a mantra that I had to make every scene count. That seems to have leaked over into the novella because every sequence has at least one if not three plotlines running through it. No fluff here. (I hope.)